SOP: Architecture Review & Approval Process

Purpose

To define a standardized process for reviewing and approving system architecture designs, ensuring they meet business requirements, technical quality, and compliance standards before implementation begins.


Scope

  • Applies to all new projects, major feature builds, and infra changes.
  • Used by Developers, Tech Leads, Architects, DevOps, and QA leads.
  • Covers system architecture blueprints, infra diagrams, API contracts, and DB schema designs.

Objectives

  • Guarantee that architectures are scalable, secure, and cost-efficient.
  • Ensure designs align with company-wide standards (patterns, versioning, modularity).
  • Create a transparent approval workflow that avoids delays but enforces rigor.

Step-by-Step Process

Step 1 – Preparation (By Developer/Architect)

  • Draft the System Architecture Blueprint (Doc 1).
  • Create the Infrastructure Diagram (Doc 2).
  • Prepare supporting docs:
    • API Contract (Doc 4).
    • Database Schema (Doc 5).
    • Error Handling Strategy (Doc 6).
    • Logging & Observability Plan (Doc 10).
  • Log initial proposal in Architecture Decision Log (Doc 12).

Step 2 – Internal Peer Review

  • Share draft in Architecture Review channel (Slack/Teams).
  • Assign at least 2 peer reviewers (senior devs or leads).
  • Collect feedback on:
    • Scalability.
    • Security.
    • Performance.
    • Maintainability.
    • Cost implications.
  • Update proposal before formal review.

Step 3 – Formal Review Session

  • Schedule a review meeting (within 5 working days of submission).
  • Attendees: Project Lead, Architect, DevOps, QA Lead, Security Rep (if required).
  • Presenter walks through:
    • Business requirement → design rationale.
    • Architecture diagrams + modules.
    • Data flows + integration points.
    • Risks & constraints.
  • Reviewers challenge assumptions, raise risks, and request changes.

Step 4 – Approval or Revision

  • Outcomes:
    1. Approved: Architecture locked for implementation.
    2. Approved with Changes: Minor adjustments required, no re-review.
    3. Rejected: Major gaps → revise and resubmit.
  • Decision logged in ADR (Doc 12) with date & rationale.

Step 5 – Post-Approval Communication

  • Update Project Documentation Hub (Confluence/Notion).
  • Share approved blueprint & diagrams with all developers.
  • Mark relevant tickets as “Ready for Dev” in PM tool.
  • Archive all feedback for future audits.

Roles & Responsibilities

RoleResponsibility
Developer/ArchitectDrafts blueprint + supporting docs
Peer ReviewersProvide feedback during informal review
Project LeadChairs formal review, ensures timeline
DevOps EngineerValidates infra feasibility + costs
QA LeadValidates testability & quality criteria
Security RepEnsures compliance with security standards
Documentation OwnerUploads & maintains approved artifacts

Governance

  • Review SLA: Every architecture must be reviewed within 5 working days.
  • Quorum: Minimum 3 reviewers (Lead + DevOps + QA) must sign-off.
  • Change Control: Any architecture changes post-approval require a new ADR entry and mini-review.
  • Audit Trail: All approved docs stored in central repository with versioning.