Section A – Candidate & Interview Details
When to Fill: Every interviewer fills this, regardless of stage.
Instructions:
Write basic details so HR can match feedback to the correct candidate and interview round.
Fields:
- Candidate Name: ________________________
- Role Applied For: ________________________
- Interview Stage: (Screening / Technical / Managerial / HR-Final)
- Date: ________________________
- Interviewer Name: ________________________
Section B – Core Evaluation
When to Fill: Every interviewer fills this section, regardless of stage.
This section ensures all candidates are measured on some basic common skills (communication, behavior, learning ability) in addition to role-specific skills.
Instructions:
- Rate each area 1–5 (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent).
- Always write at least one supporting comment (short, specific).
- If you didn’t get enough signal to judge, select “N/A” instead of guessing.
| Pillar | What to Look For | Rating (1–5 / N/A) | Comments (Give at least one example) |
| Communication Skills | Did the candidate explain ideas clearly? Did they listen carefully and respond relevantly? | ☐1 ☐2 ☐3 ☐4 ☐5 ☐N/A | e.g., “Explained project in structured way, but struggled with technical terms.” |
| Behavioral & Team Fit | Did they show professionalism, respect, and ability to collaborate? | ☐1 ☐2 ☐3 ☐4 ☐5 ☐N/A | e.g., “Spoke about team success, not just individual wins.” |
| Learning Agility | Did they show curiosity, openness to feedback, and ability to adapt/learn? | ☐1 ☐2 ☐3 ☐4 ☐5 ☐N/A | e.g., “Asked about new tools and how team uses them.” |
Section C – Stage-Specific Evaluation
When to Fill: Only fill the part that matches your interview stage.
Choose the section below based on the stage you’re conducting. Ignore the others.
1. Screening Stage (TA / HR)
Focus: Motivation, interest, and basic fit.
Instructions:
- Use this in the first call/interaction.
- Keep it short — check if the candidate is worth moving forward.
- Rate 1–5, or N/A if not relevant. Always add a short note.
| Screening Criteria | What to Look For | Rating (1–5 / N/A) | Comments |
| Motivation | Why do they want this role/company? Is the answer thoughtful or generic? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Role Fit | Do their skills/experience match the JD basics? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Communication (Initial Check) | Can they hold a professional conversation? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Career Alignment | Does this role make sense in their career story? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A |
2. Technical Stage (Department SMEs)
Focus: Role-specific technical/functional depth.
Instructions:
- Use the role-specific rubric insert (Development, QA, Design, PM, Sales, etc.).
- Don’t judge behavior here — focus on skills and problem-solving.
- If unsure, select N/A instead of guessing.
Example Insert – Backend Developer:
| Technical Criteria | What to Look For | Rating (1–5 / N/A) | Comments |
| Coding & Logic | Did they solve problems correctly and efficiently? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| System Design | Can they design scalable solutions? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| API & Database Knowledge | Do they understand integrations and queries? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Debugging | How do they approach fixing issues? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A |
(Other roles → QA: Testing strategy, Sales: Pitching/Objection Handling, etc.)
3. Managerial Stage (Hiring Manager / Dept Head)
Focus: Leadership, ownership, and team dynamics.
Instructions:
- Assess how candidate will fit into the team and handle responsibility.
- Use real examples from their answers, not assumptions.
| Managerial Criteria | What to Look For | Rating (1–5 / N/A) | Comments |
| Decision-Making | Did they explain how they make choices under pressure? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Team Fit | Will they collaborate well with peers and juniors? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Ownership & Accountability | Do they take responsibility for outcomes? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Stakeholder Management | Can they handle clients/managers diplomatically? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A |
4. HR-Final Stage (HR / CHRO)
Focus: Cultural alignment, EVP, and long-term commitment.
Instructions:
- Confirm values, compensation, and commitment.
- Don’t re-test technical skills — focus on EVP alignment.
| HR Criteria | What to Look For | Rating (1–5 / N/A) | Comments |
| Growth Alignment | Do they want to grow with us? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Work-Life Balance Expectations | Are their expectations realistic? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Compensation Fit | Do expectations match policy range? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A | |
| Long-Term Fit | Do they see themselves here beyond 1–2 years? | ☐1–5 ☐N/A |
Section D – Alignment with Company Values (EVP Pillars)
When to Fill: Every interviewer must fill this — regardless of stage.
This section checks if the candidate aligns with our core company values: Growth, Impact, Culture, Rewards, Balance.
Instructions:
- Think about what you observed during the conversation (attitude, examples shared, body language).
- Don’t guess — only rate if you saw a clear signal. If not, select N/A.
- For each pillar, mark Low / Medium / High and write a short note.
| EVP Pillar | What to Look For | Alignment (Low / Medium / High / N/A) | Example Notes |
| Growth | Did the candidate show curiosity, willingness to learn, openness to feedback? | ☐Low ☐Medium ☐High ☐N/A | “Asked about training opportunities.” |
| Impact | Did they talk about taking ownership, delivering outcomes, making a difference? | ☐Low ☐Medium ☐High ☐N/A | “Explained how they improved a client process.” |
| Culture | Did they show collaboration, respect for others, positive team spirit? | ☐Low ☐Medium ☐High ☐N/A | “Gave examples of helping teammates succeed.” |
| Rewards | Did they show drive for excellence, recognition, contributing to success? | ☐Low ☐Medium ☐High ☐N/A | “Proud of a project where they exceeded targets.” |
| Balance | Did they demonstrate professionalism and realistic work-life expectations? | ☐Low ☐Medium ☐High ☐N/A | “Discussed managing deadlines without burnout.” |
Section E – Strengths & Concerns
When to Fill: Every interviewer fills this — regardless of stage.
This section captures your personal observations about the candidate beyond ratings.
Instructions:
- Be short and specific (1–2 lines each is enough).
- Focus on evidence you saw/heard, not assumptions.
- Avoid generic comments like “good candidate” or “not a fit.”
Fields:
- Key Strengths observed:
- (Examples: “Explained complex tech concepts simply,” “Handled client objection with confidence,” “Showed strong curiosity about product roadmap.”)
- Areas of Concern / Red Flags:
- (Examples: “Struggled to explain previous work clearly,” “Gave vague answers on problem ownership,” “Salary expectations much higher than band.”)
Section F – Overall Recommendation
When to Fill: Every interviewer fills this at the end of their stage.
This section forces a clear decision signal so candidates don’t get stuck in limbo.
Instructions:
- Select only one option below.
- Base your choice on the ratings + strengths/concerns you just filled, not gut feeling.
- If you’re unsure, choose Keep in Pipeline (don’t leave blank).
- Add a short justification (1–2 lines).
Options:
☐ Strong Hire – Candidate exceeded expectations in almost all areas; clear standout.
☐ Hire – Candidate met expectations; suitable for the role with minor gaps.
☐ Keep in Pipeline – Not the right fit for this role now, but promising for future roles.
☐ No Hire – Candidate does not meet requirements; not suitable for current or future roles.
Final Comments (mandatory – 1–2 lines):